Tracking device was used by the stalker enabling him to stalk me across state lines
The stalker is very unpredictable yet predictable.
The stalker will not quit, This is a very sick person and one who if he sees an opportunity will cause bodily harm or even worse. This stalking is taking place years after a divorce was finalized. This person has been known to hold grudges and anger against others and especially the government for years even decades.
There is a permanent restraining order in place issued against this man.
What is also very concerning about this, he has enlisted the help of his buddy, enlisted the help from friends who are still in law enforcement to acquire personal data.
Plausible deniablity - trying to cause bodily harm
While walking my dog on an old forest service road, the stalker tried to run me and my K9 over. No one would have known what happened. When reported to law enforcement and the attorney, he told them he had planned to be in this area and said he told a friend he was going to the mountain. A tracking device was on my car so he knew exactly where I was.
Plausible Deniability was used- the term typically implies forethought, such as intentionally setting up the conditions to plausibly avoid responsibility for one's past and future actions or knowledge.
Stalkers feel they are above the law, a domestic violence protection order and restraining order are just a piece of paper, they are thumbing their nose at the judge and think laws don't apply to them.
These stalkers are not the "normal" stalker you would think of. These stalkers are people who are in a line of work with community service, helping others who are hurt, upholding the law, people "respect" them
Stalker entered the locked vehicle, violating a domestic violence protection order
We were able to show that the finger marks found on the victim's vehicle door did belong to the subject who had been stalking them.
The stalker entered the locked vehicle, violating a domestic violence protection order that was issued against him
There is a match with the stalker's right hand, a unique middle finger distal interphalangeal crease, and the pointer finger. The stalker was wearing a type of protective gloves typically worn by EMS personnel; the outer edges of this print are not smooth.
These little, very important details, were overlooked and/or ignored by the deputies responding to the multiple stalking incidents
Site Content
a single bullet ~ powerful
Over the years, he would remind me and make sure I didn't forget -
a single bullet will have someone's name on it.
A single, 9mm hollow-point bullet, was strategically placed near my garage door
after he had been removed from the home by a DVPO for domestic violence.
I knew this meant the bullet had my name on it.
This was stalking, terroisim, and a violation of the DVPO and a threat to me, he was not to be near me, my animals or the home.
unique bend of the metacarpophalangeal joint middle finger left hand
Again, same stalker, different stalking event. Left hand, a middle finger placed in front of the game camera. On our anniversary.
There is a unique bend of the metacarpophalangeal joint middle finger left hand. There is a DVPO in place against this stalker.
stalker
A stalker feels they are above the law, they don't have to obey a domestic violence protection order issued in a court of law. When this was reported to a deputy Sheriff. the answer was, they have a right to walk on the road, even though they are not to be in the area.
I want to know, what rights does a victims have?